NHL POOL rock la puck Boxes pool |
NOV 20, 2024 (6h55)
The main difficulty is probably that there are so many specialists. There are a ton of different developers now, each specializing in different types of products. If you’re talking about a company or studio as a whole, I suggest learning more about Binary. They have specialists like https://binary-studio.com/hire-net-developers/ who work with the reliable .NET platform and can create various types of software, as well as solve tasks like creating new applications, maintaining old systems, or providing custom solutions for businesses.
|
NOV 20, 2024 (6h40)
You can choose a company based on reviews, so why not do just that? Then, you simply explain to the developers during a consultation what you need, and what you want to achieve for your business. That's how people work with specialists.
|
NOV 20, 2024 (6h11)
I suspect that continuing work without some additional tools and software would just be inefficient. Business needs renovations, new tools, capabilities—everything that will help automate workflows. However, I don’t understand anything about development or how to choose developers.
|
G | A | PTS | ||
Mikko Rantanen | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
Valeri Nichushkin | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Anthony Cirelli | 2 | - | 2 | |
Jake Debrusk | 2 | - | 2 | |
Jonathan Drouin | 2 | - | 2 | |
Sebastian Aho | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Ivan Barbashev | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Samuel Girard | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Oliver Kylington | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Anton Lundell | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Patrick Maroon | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Lukas Reichel | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Marco Rossi | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Tomas Tatar | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Matthew Boldy | - | 2 | 2 | |
Jack Eichel | - | 2 | 2 | |
Brandon Hagel | - | 2 | 2 | |
Travis Konecny | - | 2 | 2 | |
Anze Kopitar | - | 2 | 2 | |
Cale Makar | - | 2 | 2 | |
Complete stats |
STANDINGS 2024-2025 | ||||||
TOP 10 | GP | W | L | OL | PTS | |
Jets | 20 | 17 | 3 | - | 34 | |
Wild | 19 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 29 | |
Hurricanes | 19 | 14 | 5 | - | 28 | |
Devils | 22 | 13 | 7 | 2 | 28 | |
Capitals | 19 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 27 | |
Golden Knights | 20 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 26 | |
Maple Leafs | 20 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 26 | |
Rangers | 18 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 25 | |
Panthers | 20 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 25 | |
Flames | 20 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 25 | |
Conference | Cumulative |