While Kane, the hockey player, is exactly what many teams are looking for - a big, physical, competitive, scoring winger with an excellent shot - his off-ice persona has turned him into somewhat of a pariah around the National Hockey League.
One hurdle that the Sharks may face in moving Kane is that the 30-year-old has a no-trade clause and has the ability to submit a 3-team trade list. It is worth mentioning that Kane has the ability to waive in order for the Sharks to facilitate his trade.
In an attempt to get out in front of this one, I'll ask the question before the rumours actually start to take flight. Does Evander Kane make sense for the Toronto Maple Leafs?
Well, the most obvious factor here is that he checks a lot of boxes for Leafs GM Kyle Dubas. He's a top-six left winger, he scores a lot of goals, he hits everything in sight, he wants to win and he will not be pushed around and will drop the gloves if necessary.
The problem is that even with salary retention, say 50%, Kane will still carry a $3.5M cap hit, so the Leafs would have to make a move to two to clear some space or send back salary in order to make a deal with the Sharks.
If the Sharks were willing to take back Nick Ritchie and Pierre Engvall in the deal, along with a pick or maybe a prospect, the money could work. The package would be very underwhelming in the grand scheme, because of Kane's current perceived value.. but is there a fit?
One of the Leafs' major assets right now seems to be the chemistry on the bench and in the locker room. Kane, by all accounts, has been a player who tends to rub some people the wrong way. As you'll recall, during the offseason a number of unnamed Sharks players had revealed that they would prefer it if the team moved Evander Kane as he was a major distraction in the locker room.
Does having veterans like Jason Spezza, John Tavares, Jake Muzzin and Wayne Simmonds change that in Toronto? Can any of these players, or a collective help to tame Kane and keep him in line? I'm not necessarily sure the organization would want to find out.
For now, even with salary retention, I don't feel as though Kane and the off-ice circus that comes with him would be a fit in a media hot-bed like Toronto, where every aspect of a player is over-analyzed.
Still, it's fun to think about the Leafs having a player who checks that many boxes all at once who can certainly fix some of the problems that the team does have almost immediately. It's just unfortunate that he likely creates more problems than he solves for any team, the Leafs included.
G | A | PTS | ||
Brandon Hagel | - | 5 | 5 | |
Nikita Kucherov | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Will Cuylle | 2 | - | 2 | |
Nico Hischier | 2 | - | 2 | |
Ivan Barbashev | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Jack Eichel | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Morgan Frost | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Mason Marchment | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Tyler Seguin | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Emil Andrae | 1 | - | 1 | |
Zachary Bolduc | 1 | - | 1 | |
Anthony Cirelli | 1 | - | 1 | |
Sean Couturier | 1 | - | 1 | |
Lars Eller | 1 | - | 1 | |
Filip Forsberg | 1 | - | 1 | |
Adam Gaudette | 1 | - | 1 | |
Luke Glendening | 1 | - | 1 | |
Jake Guentzel | 1 | - | 1 | |
Thomas Harley | 1 | - | 1 | |
Erik Haula | 1 | - | 1 | |
Complete stats |
STANDINGS 2024-2025 | ||||||
TOP 10 | GP | W | L | OL | PTS | |
Jets | 21 | 17 | 4 | - | 34 | |
Wild | 20 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 30 | |
Devils | 23 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 30 | |
Hurricanes | 20 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 29 | |
Golden Knights | 21 | 13 | 6 | 2 | 28 | |
Maple Leafs | 21 | 13 | 6 | 2 | 28 | |
Capitals | 20 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 27 | |
Flames | 21 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 27 | |
Stars | 19 | 13 | 6 | - | 26 | |
Rangers | 19 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 25 | |
Conference | Cumulative |